Many hide the truth because it is too raw, unpalatable, uncomfortable or outright horrifying. It is vitally important we watch our language, because it plays a great part in how we shape our world and in how we create our reality.
It is hard, we are then told, to know exactly where the line exists between terrorists and the brave would-be liberators of oppressed people: Besides, many nations in the world have come into existence after lengthy struggles for liberation. Many pundits assert that the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is purely a matter of perception.
Similar acts get different labels depending on who is doing the labeling. In making a judgment on freedom fighters versus terrorists, there is more at work than a "perception.
It is helpful to get at the difference with an analogy, a consideration of the important difference between two of the seven deadly sins: Though often lumped together and seen simply as the desire of one person or group to possess what another owns, greed and envy are not identical.
Greed has to do with acquisition; we desperately want what another has. Theft is the culminating sinful act of greed. Envy, on the other hand, is not directed at some item we want that belongs to another, but at that other person or group. Its aim is destroying the happiness of others.
Envy seeks not to acquire but to destroy, rejoicing in the misfortune of others. Vandalism and arson are two of the best examples of acts that have their roots in envy. While greed can be assuaged, envy can not. It is never satisfied until its object is destroyed.
The issue at hand is not whether fighters for a noble cause often act in reprehensible, cruel, and destructive ways. Such actions, however, have as their goal acquiring or reacquiring something valuable, something highly desired. This may be land, sovereignty, or political goals such as liberty or economic equality.
Freedom fighters usually come from oppressed or marginalized groups that have been deprived of something important, such as a homeland, and their struggle is to obtain it or gain it back.
In other words, if there is a sinful motive in the dreams and actions of a freedom fighter, it is likely the sin of greed. This is not so with terrorism. Terrorists are less concerned with acquisition than they are with destruction. They are usually clever enough to cloak their motives by hijacking the popular will of an oppressed people, but their wrath is not appeased when they acquire what they say they want.
For example, would the war against Israel be over once the Palestinians got their own homeland? Most likely it would not. The real goal of terrorist groups is not acquiring but destroying.
Terrorism is thus qualitatively different from armed movement for freedom and liberty. Terrorism is not like greed; it is an extreme form of destructive envy.
Though the acts were ostensibly cries for help for the Palestinians, there was no strategic military purpose involved. The attack was pure destruction, an act designed for one end: Recognizing this difference will help us to refrain from trying to "understand" the terrorists or giving their acts any nobility or value.
The willful destruction of the World Trade Center with the loss of over 4, people does not deserve such noble sentiment.
Envy can be neither sanctioned nor understood. It is a hateful attitude that, when played out, results in evil, destructive acts.
It is a nihilistic poison that corrodes the soul of the one who envies and endangers the well-being of the envied. The same is true of terrorism. Terrorists will never be satisfied until the object of their hatred is destroyed.In making a judgment on freedom fighters versus terrorists, there is more at work than a "perception." I am convinced that there is a metaphysical difference, not .
The survey reference is invalid. The link you have used may be corrupt. A resistance movement is an organized effort by some portion of the civil population of a country to withstand the legally established government or an occupying power and to disrupt civil order and stability.
This leads to the aphorism "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". Radical Indonesian cleric Aman Abdurrahman, blamed for a terrorist attack on a Jakarta Starbucks cafe, is sentenced to death.
Terrorist definition, a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism. See more. The folks over at CNN have sunk to new depths. One of their top contributors has referred to a cop-killing terrorist as a 'freedom fighter.'.